A long-standing concept of providing aid, particularly in the context of supporting individuals with health conditions, has been a widely accepted practice in various settings including workplaces, educational institutions, and public spaces.

On the one hand, this practice has also been exposed to opposition, with many arguing that it reinforces and undermines social inequalities that are stemming from preconceived notions.

However, the notion behind offering support someone with a impairment is to ensure safety. In contrast, this 'act of kindness' can also be perceived as a care-giving move that reduces the independence and self-advocacy of the individual being escorted.

By providing assistance someone, we are fundamentally removing them of their autonomy and critical thinking abilities, implying that they are unsuitable of navigating the world on their own.

Such social inequality is based on preconceived notions, with the supporter asserting a superior level of control and dominion over the individual being aided.

It is a manifestation of the cultural norms that prioritize able-bodiedness and independence, assuming that people with impairments are essentially intolerant and fragile.

As assumption is not only limiting but additionally exploitative, as it withholds people with disabilities the potential to contribute fully in their societies and self-advocate.

Moreover, providing assistance can also be perceived as a form of institutional gatekeeping, preventing individuals with impairments from accessing certain locations or resources that are viewed as inaccessible for them.

By labeling someone as inadequate to operate certain environments, we are essentially explaining for them what they can and escorting companies cannot do, curtailing their options and self-reliance.

Recognizing and disrupting these power dynamics requires a shift in perspective. We require to shift towards from a protective attitude and towards a more empowering method that emphasizes the self-reliance and agency of individuals with health conditions.

This means participating people with impairments in the problem-solving process and seeking their feedback and feedback. It also means treating their capacity for self-advocacy and independence.

Finally, our target should be to establish a more inclusive and available atmosphere, where people with impairments have the equitable opportunities and choices as anyone else.

As requires a essential change of our cultural norms and beliefs, migrating towards a culture of paternalism and embracing one that values and encourages self-reliance, decision-making capacity, and equity.